Subject: VocEd: Mike Frost (Guest) - Some emerging problems
I wonder a little at how long the energy and enthusiasm displayed by
those involved in the development, implementation and management of
successful vocational programs will continue. I think part of the agenda
for implementing and managing the kind of change envisaged by the federal
Government in its New Apprenticeships policy and supporting programs, like
School-to-Work needs to take account of some of the realities, not to use
as a weapon to condemn but to anticipate likely problem areas in the
future and to take remedial action. Let me share some of my perceptions
based on what I observe, hear and read:
Coordinator Profile VETNETwork surveyed its members last year as part
of its project evaluation and part of that research allowed us to piece
together a profile of what may well be a "typical" coordinator.
They are predominately women (70% of the sample ) who have been teaching
for over 15 years, 50% of the sample over 20 years. Many come from Career
Education-Work Experience teaching and seem to take on vocational programs
as an additional task because they are seen as the most suited. The sample
showed a very low access to and use of internet services (less than 10%
had accessed VETNETwork's website.
So what conclusion do we draw from this trend data. We need to broaden
the recruitment base to include greater heterogeneity in age and in
particular young teachers. Training institutions like the universities
should now be beginning to look to future training needs of vocational
education teachers. Indeed if 60% and above of post-compulsory students
complete a vocational program then a far greater range of teachers will
need to be skilled in some ways as vocational education teachers.
We also need to continue to look at ways of expanding use of and access
to on-line services like Voc-Ed Coordinators Online. Teachers and
coordinators find it difficult to systematically use email, for example,
unless it is on their desks.
Coordinators who undertake training in Workplace Assessor and Training
programs generally do not report highly satisfactory outcomes, at least in
terms of the use of such programs in their coordinating roles.
There is also some suggestion that coordinator burn-out could become a
problem. Some suggest a 2-3 year span as a teacher/coordinator is
sufficient. The particular cause of stress identified by some is the
difficulty of mixing conventional teaching practices with the relatively
more stimulating vocational approach. A host of other contributing
stresses are also commonly identified ranging from constant battles with
managers, systems, colleagues and orthodox culture.
Workplacements There are some emerging indications that business and
industry can tire of supporting workplacements though the reasons are yet
to be determined. It seems likely that on-going support is contingent on
outcomes for industry - in other words they need to get something in
return for the effort they put in particularly if it involves formal
training which is mostly unable to attract subsidy. Community spirit alone
won't provide this - there has to be something in it for them.
Some concerns have been expressed at likely outcomes for major
cooperative projects, like Pauline Rice's a development and implementation
of a regional strategic plan for VET in Schools for the Northern
Metropolitan Region of Melbourne outlined this morning when funding, like
ASTF support, is no longer available. Will associated industries remain as
involved.
Program Costs A constant theme that never seems to be satisfactorily
resolved is the matter of TAFE charges for program delivery. In Tasmania
the very few programs running as cooperative ventures with TAFE have had a
Ministerial direction applied so that fees are not applied. Victoria,
which seems to have an extensive set of joint initiatives with TAFE
through its former Dual Recognition program, apparently allows schools to
carry that cost.
A number of school-industry programs, like TRAC, jointly contribute to
the operational cost of programs. There seems to be increasing reluctance
on the part of industry, over time, to continue to support them
financially when they are also expected to contribute substantially to
workplace training and assessment.
The direct support from school systems varies from state to state and
the extent to which such systems will progressively assume responsibility
is a real issue particularly as the ASTF moves away from ongoing support
of established programs. The implications if Federal Government support is
reduced should also be considered.
Suitability of Schools as VET Providers While there are many shining
examples of schools which have successfully embraced vocational education
and enriched their schools in a variety of ways, there are many (probably
over 40%) which find it a hard graft. I hear of teachers battling to get
in place a modest set of programs, confronted with the usual things that
most of us who have been involved in managing change in schools have
experienced. Fitting around school bus times (yeas school buses are the
single biggest deciding factor in school management in Australia), school
timetables that reflect the academic tradition and its associated culture,
the needs of specialist and part-time staff, cautious perhaps
unimaginative school leaders and decision makers, perceived parental
resistance and the like.
Perhaps the answer is that traditionally organised schools are not good
at VET provision, but with a little imagination the management and
operation of the school can be transformed, and they can become very good
at providing quality vocational programs with extensive workplacement.
There is still a tendency for educators and the wider training market
to see VET in school as something of a temporary aberration, that it will
ultimately disappear and that it is not legitimate. I was queried recently
by an ITAB about a conference flyer promoting Tasmanian Vocational
Education and Training Network's inaugural conference. The implication was
that this deceived the legitimate training community because it pictured
International Catarmaran's apprentices on the front and of course the
conference was for vocational education in schools, something entirely
different to VET.
There are no doubt a range of other issues that can be identified. My
intention in raising them is to confirm that these are nationally
recognised issues that affect very many teachers and coordinators and that
we should be taking account of them now and begin to look for ways of
addressing them.
Mike Frost
Executive Officer
VETNETwork - Vocational Education and Training Network
Mailing Address: VETNETwork PO Box 424 Rosny Park TAS 7018
Ph 0362 449254
Fax 0362 449299
Mobile 0412 053738
Email mfrost@info.rosny.tased.edu.au
To view all of the interaction with the online guest browse
the voced-coord
list archive from July 21 - August 1
[back to list of guest postings]